This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: non-local goto optimization

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:39:17 -0700
Subject: Re: non-local goto optimization
References: <462C6A54.7080502@codesourcery.com> <84fc9c000704230141l5afe1b33x7900349678836b94@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:41:01AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> With the adding of the bit to the struct function you made va_list_gpr_size 
> and
> va_list_fpr_size unaligned, please add the bit after the new
> (temporary) gimplified
> bit.  (Possibly also add some comments denoting where eight bits are
> full to avoid
> such mistake in the future)

Actually, if we want these aligned, they should be moved to the
beginning of the bit fields.


r~

References:
- non-local goto optimization
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: non-local goto optimization
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]