This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC/RFA: patch for PR 22156: improve SRA for bit-fields
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: RFC/RFA: patch for PR 22156: improve SRA for bit-fields
- References: <or648xoi7m.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <200703191249.52321.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <or8xdsihdy.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <oraby8gs5m.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20070320234004.GB28738@redhat.com> <orejnjca8r.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orvegqjhu5.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Hi,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2007, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > I found and fixed another bug in the type used for the replacement
> > BIT_FIELD_REF for a field block, which was causing some trouble
> > building the Ada rts (great testcases there! ;-)
>
> There were a number of other problems, some minor, some major, in the
> last patch I posted. This one has actually survived bootstrap on
> x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-pc-linux-gnu without any regressions (*),
> and it built sh-elf and arm-eabi crosses, with manual testing to
> verify proper functioning of the endianness-dependent bits. The
> testsuite wouldn't run in a unified tree.
This patch broke m68k as mentioned in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-04/msg00830.html
Any help appreciated...
bye, Roman