This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:00:51 Daniel Franke wrote: > Any objections against the proposed split of indices? No reply implies no objections. Thus, I will continue ... > How about an additional index for command line options? I checked gcc's manual, there the very same index is available. The definition of the op-index is probably a copy-paste artifact. Nevertheless, such an index seems to be quite usefull, hence I made the necessary changes. Please find a patch attached. If this patch is approved and applied, it is only a single line change to merge indices again afterwards. If necessary, simply add @syncodeindex op cp to the beginning of gfortran.texi and the option index will be merged into the concept index. :ADDPATCH fortran: 2007-04-23 Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com> * gfortran.texi: Added node and menu entry for an option index. * invoke.texi: Moved command line option related entries of the concept index to the option index. Tested info, dvi and html targets on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for 4.2 and trunk? Regards Daniel P.S. Brooks currently has a load of doc patches to review. Could someone else take the burden and have a look at this? It's quite simple, not too much new text, just streamlining and sorting what's already there. Thanks. P.P.S. To get an idea what it will look like: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Option-Index.html
Attachment:
option-index.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |