This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch] Don't provide lstat gfortran intrinsic if target doesn't support lstat.
- From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: "Daniel Franke" <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "Danny Smith" <dannysmith at clear dot net dot nz>, GFORTRAN <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:56:29 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Don't provide lstat gfortran intrinsic if target doesn't support lstat.
- References: <56A626B0-B0D3-4B42-8FDC-3E61BEDBFAA9@gmail.com> <000001c6f66e$010f4050$6c4861cb@anykey> <640ad44b0704130541p1979d14cx51a322fb8da226c@mail.gmail.com>
Instead of the patch you quote, I applied the following to mainline a month ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01605.html
Any reason why this patch wasn't applied to trunk/4.2?
It could be applied, since it's a regression wrt g77. As GCC >= 4.0.0
is not used by the mingw project, I thought it was not high-priority
to backport it. But, as I recently read Danny saying he'll make a
MinGW GCC-4.2.0 candidate when 4.2.0 is released, it is probably a
good reason to do it.
Danny, I was wondering: do you intend to provide gfortran as part of
the GCC binaries? I expect so, as you provide g77 with older GCC
packages, but a confirmation would be nice.
FX