Re: [PATCH] add insn implementing signbit to middle end and s390

["Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>]

On 4/3/07, Gellerich <gelleric@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Here is the reworked version.
>
> Concerning documentation: I would provide a description for the
> "Standard Pattern Names..." section in a separate patch. However, I
> saw that a quite similar pattern named isinf is not mentioned
> there. Is this pattern intentionally omitted, or should I add a
> description for that one, too?

Probably the nitpicking please-add-documentation was missing on its addition ;)
So, if you are at it it would be nice if you can add documentation for
that one, too.

Thanks,
Richard.