This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:47:30 +0200
Subject: Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
References: <20070327220453.GA4342@redhat.com> <46099F40.4060409@suse.de> <20070327232910.GB3360@redhat.com> <4609AB4A.6040206@suse.de> <20070327235506.GA4679@redhat.com> <460D46F9.4000607@codesourcery.com> <460D539F.1010902@suse.de> <20070330182503.GN355@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Jakub Jelinek wrote:

IMHO it is far better to just use int __attribute__((__mode__ (__pointer__))) in libstdc++ headers and don't suggest that it is necessarily the same type as intptr_t or uintptr_t.

Or just use __conditional_type which covers all the cases we actually care about.

Thanks,
Paolo.

References:
- [libstdc++]
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [libstdc++]
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [libstdc++] intptr_t usage
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]