This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Extend store ccp


On 3/23/07, Revital1 Eres <ERES@il.ibm.com> wrote:

Hello,


This patch enhance store ccp to propagate constants from stores to
loads when the previous implementation failed due to alias uncertainty.
The testcase attached demonstrates this optimization:

S[5].x = 0;
S[5].y = 0;

x = S[5].x;
y = S[5].y;

Previously x = S[5].x; failed to be replaced with x = 0.  This patch
fixes this problem by allowing the propagation of constants if all the
stores in the alias group are initialized with the same constant.

I used the get_stmt_rhs_def_stmt () function Richard Guenther
introduced in his patch to walk the virtual def-use chains
with adjustments to make it suitable for this optimization.
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00669.html)

Bootstrap and tested on PPC. OK for mainline?

You confused me a lot in that you use a name for get_def_of_stmt_rhs () that doesn't look like it checks for a single constant value ;) Maybe just make it return true or false and call it stmt_rhs_constant_val_p (stmt, val).

Or even fold it into it's only use, all_vdef_have_same_lattice_const_value.

Did you check compile-time and runtime effects of this patch like on SPEC?  I
suppose we can eliminate array zero initialization if there follows
different initialzation
with this patch.

Thanks,
Richard.

:ADDPATCH tree-ssa optimization:

Thanks,
Revital

2007-03-22 Revital Eres <eres@il.ibm.com>

        * tree-ssa-propagate.c (all_vdef_have_same_lattice_const_value):
          New function to get the defining stmt.
          (get_def_of_stmt_rhs): New helper function
          which walks on the virtual use-def chain to get the defining
stmt.
          (replace_vuses_in): Call all_vdef_have_same_lattice_const_value
          to perform the final replacement and add new parameter which
          indicates whether store cpp analysis should be extended to
          analyze memory references based on the virtual use-def chain.
          (do_store_ccp): New function.
          (substitute_and_fold): Add new parameter.
        * tree-ssa-propagate.h (all_vdef_have_same_lattice_const_value):
           Declare.
           (substitute_and_fold): Change declaration.
        * tree-vrp.c (vrp_finalize): Call substitute_and_fold with new
argument .
        * tree-ssa-ccp.c (ccp_finalize): Likewise.
          (visit_assignment): Call all_vdef_have_same_lattice_const_value
while
           performing the propogation.
       * tree-ssa-copy.c (fini_copy_prop): Call substitute_and_fold with
new
          argument.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/store_ccp_test.c: New test.

(See attached file: patch_ccp_22_3.txt)(See attached file:
store_ccp_test.txt)



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]