This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [LTO] [PATCH] Avoid middle/back-end use of set_decl_assembler_name and tree_size lang hooks

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: jimbob at google dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:39:51 EDT
Subject: Re: [LTO] [PATCH] Avoid middle/back-end use of set_decl_assembler_name and tree_size lang hooks
References: <17913.47538.408187.834465@whippen.corp.google.com> <45FF54D1.5050508@codesourcery.com> <17921.30422.185199.783914@whippen.corp.google.com> <4601AB50.8050502@codesourcery.com> <17921.52916.772841.285490@whippen.corp.google.com>

> I foresee a future in which GCC might be divided into relatively
> independent phases that can execute separately. 

Note that the FSF has always been very much against this in the past
due to copyright/licensing concerns.  I'm unaware that their position
on this has changed.

References:
- [LTO] [PATCH] Avoid middle/back-end use of set_decl_assembler_name and tree_size lang hooks
  - From: Robert Kennedy
- Re: [LTO] [PATCH] Avoid middle/back-end use of set_decl_assembler_name and tree_size lang hooks
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [LTO] [PATCH] Avoid middle/back-end use of set_decl_assembler_name and tree_size lang hooks
  - From: Robert Kennedy
- Re: [LTO] [PATCH] Avoid middle/back-end use of set_decl_assembler_name and tree_size lang hooks
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [LTO] [PATCH] Avoid middle/back-end use of set_decl_assembler_name and tree_size lang hooks
  - From: Robert Kennedy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]