This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: broken testcase gcc.dg/940510-1.c

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:43:27 -0700
Subject: Re: broken testcase gcc.dg/940510-1.c
References: <6c33472e0703201440g6f48703fy1e1957253805fedc@mail.gmail.com> <20070320215929.GA28834@redhat.com> <6c33472e0703201503p12cc9528s87f6586ca413075@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:03:34PM +0000, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> The testcase checks for one or various errors, we actually emit a
> warning and an error, none of them contain "near initialization".

Which would have been emitted from digest_init, were we not
skipping the function entirely, due to the error_mark_node type.

I guess the change is ok.  I'm not particularly motivated to
track down why the change occurred.

r~

References:
- broken testcase gcc.dg/940510-1.c
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: broken testcase gcc.dg/940510-1.c
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: broken testcase gcc.dg/940510-1.c
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]