This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: New sparse bitmap implementation


On 3/20/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
...
Copied from sbitmap.c so it matched exactly the output style for sbitmaps.  :)
I've discovered that GCC  people are less likely to use new code if
the debugging dumps don't look like what they are used to.
Of course I personally have no aversion to changing it to whatever people want.

Sounds like we should at least take Chris's suggestion and fix both your ebitmap.c and the existing sbitmap.c.

We can then spend the rest of our email bandwidth
on an endless discussion of which output format is better :)

More seriously,
I wish we have a way to unittest the basic datastructure implementations
without building the whole thing.
Then we should be able to do away with the internal checking code in ebitmap.c
as well as having much better testing...
--
#pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com";


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]