This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31163 - SAVEd derived types with ALLOCATABLE components don't work

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Paul Thomas" <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: "Tobias Burnus" <burnus at net-b dot de>, "Fortran List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:24:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31163 - SAVEd derived types with ALLOCATABLE components don't work
References: <45F7967A.50203@wanadoo.fr> <45F7B8D5.5010805@net-b.de> <de8d50360703141211x1bea2bebw890d885204867015@mail.gmail.com> <45F859A6.5060607@wanadoo.fr>

On 3/14/07, Paul Thomas <paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

Andrew,
>
> The t variable is still zero initialized as defined by either {} or by
> the case of being a static variable.
>
Ah, brilliant! Where does that happen?  I tried to follow tree.c to some
mention of this - I deduced that it was so but could not figure out how
or where.

I'll revert to the original patch then.

In somewhere in varasm.c. I always get confused where exactly also :).

-- Pinski

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR31163 - SAVEd derived types with ALLOCATABLE components don't work
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31163 - SAVEd derived types with ALLOCATABLE components don't work
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31163 - SAVEd derived types with ALLOCATABLE components don't work
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR31163 - SAVEd derived types with ALLOCATABLE components don't work
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]