This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, libfortran] fix a**(-huge(i)-1)

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:22:47 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch, libfortran] fix a**(-huge(i)-1)
References: <20070301212531.GA20856@meiner.onlinehome.de> <20070303003140.GA53650@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20070306202132.GA4745@meiner.onlinehome.de> <20070306194602.GA70395@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

IMO, it fixes a bug, and a backport looks to be straight forward,
so I see no reason not to fix 4.2.
But, you probably want to ask markm for approval.

I also think it's safe. Moreover, you can have a look at gcc@ and gcc- patches@ to see what other patches are still going into 4.2 these last few days, and it certainly doesn't look like yours is riskier :)

I'm not sure whether Mark's approval is formally needed until the branch freezes, but it certainly can't hurt.

FX

References:
- [patch, libfortran] fix a**(-huge(i)-1)
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [patch, libfortran] fix a**(-huge(i)-1)
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [patch, libfortran] fix a**(-huge(i)-1)
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [patch, libfortran] fix a**(-huge(i)-1)
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]