This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 01 Mar 2007 15:03:19 -0800
Subject: Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
References: <352a1fb20703011054s31e07ea1ye93eaa49fcc513e1@mail.gmail.com> <m3649k23bz.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <352a1fb20703011124v2ed161eelcc431ec362e8329@mail.gmail.com> <m3wt20zlt3.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <643DEA4E-C8FD-4D7B-8C3F-87DDFA51961D@apple.com>

Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:

> To steal an idea from llvm, if we permit post checkin review for
> people that submit 100 good patches, would the wheels fall off the
> bus?  It seems to work for them, is there some reason why it couldn't
> for us?  Would it be more efficient and led to happier and more
> productive employees, oops, I mean contributors or less happiness and
> more inefficiencies?

Can you describe post-checkin review?

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Chris Lattner

References:
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]