This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch fortran] Fix PR 30865

From: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:02:41 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch fortran] Fix PR 30865
References: <20070224220754.GA6319@meiner.onlinehome.de> <84fc9c000702270548y55c66c93vd40232b9586be17e@mail.gmail.com> <20070227192826.GA3083@meiner.onlinehome.de> <45E488B2.8020807@net-b.de> <45E562FD.7070301@net-b.de>

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:09:49PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:

>     D.1378 = opt1 != 0B;
>     *ires = D.1378 ? (int4) _gfortran_size1 (D.1377, (int8) *opt1) :
> (int4) _gfortran_size0 (D.1377);
 
This looks correct.

> Is this patch ok? Build and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

This is OK (but please fix the whitespace).

Thanks for correcting this so quickly!

	Thomas

References:
- [patch fortran] Fix PR 30865
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [patch fortran] Fix PR 30865
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [patch fortran] Fix PR 30865
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [patch fortran] Fix PR 30865
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [patch fortran] Fix PR 30865
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]