This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR30887 and PR30888 - overdone constraints on %VAL


Tobias Burnus wrote:
*ping*

Fixes:
- %VAL( ) with non-default kinds now supported
- The following program gave a compile-time error:

+      CALL DOIT( %VAL( P ) )
+      CALL DOIT( I )
+      CALL DOIT( %VAL( P ) )


Tobias Burnus wrote:
Paul Thomas wrote:
The attached are completely self explanatory fixes for the above to
%VAL problems.


Tobias,


With the patch of 2/22/2007 I am getting the following failures:

Running /home/jerry/gcc/gcc43/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_optional_dim_1.f90 -Os execution test



Do I have the right patch? or is this some other regression?


Jerry


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]