This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Then you are probably moving in wrong direction worsening the >> generated code. It is not only performance. The generated code size >> for x86_64 (SPECInt2000) was 0.5% bigger on the branch before the >> patch and I am sure it will be even bigger after the patch. > > > The patch will never be applied. It was not meant to be. > Good because SPECFP2000 for ppc64 is 0.5% better (SPECInt2000 is the same) on the branch than on the mainline at the last merge point. And this patch could remove this achievement.
There's now daily SPEC2k and C++bench (tramp3d, DLV and others) numbers from dataflow branch available from http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/SPEC/C{INT|FP}/sb-haydn-df-64/ and http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench-haydn-df/ (or follow the links from gcctest's home page)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |