Re: PING: [PATCH][RFC] PR c++/30659 segfault w/ invalid input

["Seongbae Park" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>]

On 2/14/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Argh, I replied to the wrong patch. The previous mail was meant to be
> a reply to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01284.html.
>
> I guess that there is nothing I can do to fix the mess now. Sorry about that.

No problem.

> On 14/02/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Two minor nitpicks:
> >
> >  -Wunused  -Wunused-function  -Wunused-label  -Wunused-parameter @gol
> > --Wunused-value  -Wunused-variable  -Wvariadic-macros @gol
> > +-Wunused-value  -Wunused-variable  -Wvariable-length-array @gol
> > +-Wvariadic-macros @gol
> >  -Wvolatile-register-var  -Wwrite-strings}
> >
> > s/-Wvariable-length-array/-Wvla
> >
> > +Wvla
> > +C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_vla) Init(-1)
> > +Warn if a variable length array is used
> > +
> >  Wvariadic-macros
> >  C ObjC C++ ObjC++
> >  Do not warn about using variadic macros when -pedantic
> >
> > I am sure you will notice it when merging, but just in case: you need
> > to add 'Warning' to the end of the second line.

I don't understand which line I need to add "Warning" to.

> > In both cases, Wvla does not precede Wvariadic-macros in collating order.

Both fixed.
Thanks for the comment.
--
#pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com";