Re: PING: [PATCH][RFC] PR c++/30659 segfault w/ invalid input

["Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>]

Argh, I replied to the wrong patch. The previous mail was meant to be
a reply to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01284.html.

I guess that there is nothing I can do to fix the mess now. Sorry about that.

Manuel.


On 14/02/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Two minor nitpicks:
>
>  -Wunused  -Wunused-function  -Wunused-label  -Wunused-parameter @gol
> --Wunused-value  -Wunused-variable  -Wvariadic-macros @gol
> +-Wunused-value  -Wunused-variable  -Wvariable-length-array @gol
> +-Wvariadic-macros @gol
>  -Wvolatile-register-var  -Wwrite-strings}
>
> s/-Wvariable-length-array/-Wvla
>
> +Wvla
> +C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_vla) Init(-1)
> +Warn if a variable length array is used
> +
>  Wvariadic-macros
>  C ObjC C++ ObjC++
>  Do not warn about using variadic macros when -pedantic
>
> I am sure you will notice it when merging, but just in case: you need
> to add 'Warning' to the end of the second line.
>
> In both cases, Wvla does not precede Wvariadic-macros in collating order.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Manuel.
>
>
> On 14/02/07, Seongbae Park <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please review and comment:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00516.html
> >
> > Thanks!
> > --
> > #pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com";
> >