This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR30391: GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT vs. middle-end

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, iant at google dot com, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:52:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR30391: GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT vs. middle-end
References: <19c433eb0702060955u70ea6b56j1c340fe4e0c2d12c@mail.gmail.com> <19c433eb0702060958sa128fa4g6b71e2d16098eef6@mail.gmail.com> <3087.208.41.78.162.1170787609.squirrel@mail.eyesopen.com> <C5E29D86-34D5-461C-BF97-839AEA7F4810@gmail.com>

> I'm not sure what the status of the patch and there's been no word  
> from Aldy. So, all I can do is try to convey by a few words the idea  
> that this is breaking real-life codes in real-life situations (-O is  
> not something so unusual).

I'm looking into right now.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] PR30391: GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT vs. middle-end
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: [PATCH] PR30391: GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT vs. middle-end
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [PATCH] PR30391: GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT vs. middle-end
  - From: FX Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]