This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Add a new option -Wvariable-length-array


On 07/02/07, Seongbae Park <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/6/07, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Seongbae Park wrote:
>

Ok. Does the following behavior look reasonable ?


I think the confusion will be reduced if we had a list of guidelines on how diagnostics should behave. Even if we don't currently follow our own guidelines, they will provide a common goal, so we can gradually move towards that goal.

Things that the guidelines will clarify is whether there is any
difference between: "-Wfoo -Wno-foo" and "-Wno-foo -Wfoo". Also, it
could answer questions about how to name a new warning option, how to
test a new warning option, when a warning should be enabled by
default/ Wall / Wextra / pedantic / itself only.

Cheers,

Manuel.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]