This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [m68k 09/13] Convert some text peepholes

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:39 +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jeffrey Law <law@redhat.com> writes:
> > Ah.  I'm still not comfortable with the MOD_INDEX_REG_CLASS
> > patch.
> 
> OK.  Just so we're on the same page, what's the blocking issue here?
> I've tried to answer the PA question.
I haven't had a chance to look at your response yet.  I've been on the
road some the last couple weeks and my GCC time is very limited these
days.

> 
> > Is there any way to break out the peephole patch separately so that we
> > can then go forward with Roman's peephole patches?
> 
> Sure, but Roman's patch is independent of mine.  Rather than remove
> the conflict in the patch I posted, and retest, then update Roman's
> patch to apply on top of that, it would probably be easiest just
> to go with Roman's patch as-is.
OK.  Whichever way y'all feel is best to proceed.

jeff
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]