This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Status of ColdFire submission (some rtl & testsuite impact)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, richard at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:05:47 -0800
- Subject: Re: Status of ColdFire submission (some rtl & testsuite impact)
- References: <87zm7wh0a9.fsf@firetop.home>
Richard Sandiford wrote:
> [ColdFire 56/63] ColdFire multilibs and --with-arch
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00813.html
OK, unless objection from M68K maintainers within 48 hours.
> [ColdFire 58/63] XFAIL mul-subnormal-single-1 for ColdFire FPUs
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00815.html
OK, but please update the comment:
+ # ColdFire FPUs require software handling of subnormals. Linux does
+ # not yet have this.
change the last sentence to say "Linux 2.X.Y does not have this" so that
the comment remains true in future, and so that future users (of Linux
4.12.23) might, if they see this pass, realize why and be able to make
an intelligent decision about whether it's time to remove the XFAIL.
> Unreviewed testsuite patches that have a wider scope than just m68k:
>
> [ColdFire 59/63] compat-related testsuite fixes for uClinux
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00816.html
OK, unless ojection from testsuite maintainers within 24 hours.
> [ColdFire 60/63] Tweak the memset() builtin tests
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00817.html
Likewise.
> [ColdFire 61/63] Fix vsnprintf() tests on uClibc
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00818.html
Likewise.
> [ColdFire 62/63] Tighten check in 20030125-1.x
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00819.html
Likewise.
> Unreviewed RTL patch:
>
> Improve PARALLEL handling in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02328.html
This is OK.
> Patches whose m68k components have been approved, but whose general
> RTL bits haven't:
>
> Re: [m68k 1/2] define DWARF_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02329.html
This is OK.
I hope that the other pieces will be reviewed soon. If not, please ping
in a week.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713