This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [dataflow]: PATCH COMMITTED to make arm-elf work.

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Seongbae Park <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:57:19 +0100
Subject: Re: [dataflow]: PATCH COMMITTED to make arm-elf work.
References: <45C34A75.6080108@naturalbridge.com>

Kenneth Zadeck wrote:

The arm-elf is now regression free on the dataflow branch.  This patch
has been bootstrapped and regression tested on x86-64, x86-32, ppc and
ia-64 linux.

Most of the changes to make the arm work were not actually in the arm port.

1) ASM_INPUT with no parameters is no longer a acceptable substitute for
gen_blockage.  Gen_blockage, with no parameters is now required on all
platforms.

Does this affect user code too? Would it make sense to expand asm("") as a blockage instruction?

Thanks,

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dataflow]: PATCH COMMITTED to make arm-elf work.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: [dataflow]: PATCH COMMITTED to make arm-elf work.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

References:
- [dataflow]: PATCH COMMITTED to make arm-elf work.
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]