This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, rfc] Make store motion use alias oracle

From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann at ics dot uci dot edu>
To: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: "Victor Kaplansky" <VICTORK at il dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:35:34 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch, rfc] Make store motion use alias oracle
References: <OFBFAC585C.771589A4-ONC2257273.004DE78B-C2257273.004F8905@il.ibm.com> <200701301700.l0UH0ftE011282@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <4aca3dc20701300925g34e3be5ds6faa4317d00b1a51@mail.gmail.com>

"Daniel Berlin" <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:

  > > IMHO the right way is probably to improve the tree level alias
  > > analysis which is still _weaker_ that the RTL one in solving 3
  > > fundamental problems:
  > 
  > No it's not.  Tree level aliasing is better than RTL aliasing. Tree

That might be true, but that is not what I said. I just said that tree
level alias analysis is weaker at solving the 3 fundamental problems
that I enumerated.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, rfc] Make store motion use alias oracle
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Re: [patch, rfc] Make store motion use alias oracle
  - From: Victor Kaplansky
- Re: [patch, rfc] Make store motion use alias oracle
  - From: Dan Nicolaescu
- Re: [patch, rfc] Make store motion use alias oracle
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]