This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: Simon Baldwin <simonb at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:25:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface
References: <20070113010835.1C1AA187A8F@localhost> <m3d555vbl7.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45B6A868.3030605@google.com> <m3hcufhwrq.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45B954EF.7090207@google.com> <m3ejpd61ge.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Ian (Simon, all)

Simon Baldwin <simonb@google.com> writes:

kay... all done as discussed. Thanks for the feedback/discussion.

Patch updated, retested, and attached. Please revisit.

Approved and committed as revision 121305.

I have just noticed this thread and I'd like to have your comments about the impact of the work on libstdc++/14493: in short, submitter complained that the what() function in the standard exception classes returns an un-demangled string. Then, I thought we could easily fix the problem by way of __cxa_demangle but quickly gave up exactly because of the allocation on the heap...

Thanks,
Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface
  - From: Simon Baldwin
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface
  - From: Simon Baldwin
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Malloc-less demangler interface
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]