This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?!
- From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, rth at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:55:18 -0800
- Subject: Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?!
- References: <200701280026.32707.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <45BCF035.9070500@codesourcery.com> <45BDF49C.7090704@lu.unisi.ch> <571f6b510701290624l4a93c4f4p9a953eab08b02685@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:24:56PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> But then to have Mark *support* rth's change, that really shows the
> total lack of leadership and a common plan in the design of gcc.
There you go again. Mark did not support or oppose rth's change, he just
said that rth probably thought he had a good reason. He was merely
opposing your personal attack. We're all human, we make mistakes, there
can be better solutions.
If you think that there's a problem with a patch, there are ways to say so
without questioning the competence or good intentions of the person who
made it.