Re: [patch,commited] Do not use chrecs for description of overlaps

["Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On 1/26/07, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > On 1/26/07, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >Zdenek
>
> I think the right think to do is not to complicate things unless
> it is useful.  We do not use more elements than two now, so pretending that
> we do would make sense only if someone wants to extend the code.  This
> does not seem to be the case, on the contrary, Sebastian mentioned
> completely rewriting the code, basing it on the omega solver.  So I am
> somewhat inclined to keep the things as simple as possible.

Okay, then could you at least assert that we don't try to build
conflict functions greater than the max limit?
Right now it will just overwrite random memory if you tell it to build
one of size 3.

Thanks,
Dan