Re: [PATCH][applied] Add sincos pass, fix PR30038

["Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>]

On 1/23/07, Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I am getting a bunch of failures of builtins-* tests on IA64 HP-UX that
> I believe are related to your sincos patch.  IA64 HP-UX doesn't have a
> SINCOS function (actually it does but GCC doesn't know it yet) but it
> does have C99 functions (TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is 1).
>
> This results in calls to cexpi (or it would if GCC didn't seg fault
> first), but cexpi is not a standard C99 function and HP-UX does not have
> it.  Is this a bug in your code or am I missing something here?
>
> I can fix this on IA64 HP-UX by telling GCC that sincos is available
> but I was wondering if other platforms will have the same problem.

Can you provide me with a backtrace on the ICE?  I suppose you hit
the expand_builtin_cexpi path where it tries to expand using cexp()?

Thanks,
Richard.