This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: New implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Silvius Rus <rus at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:58:45 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Patch: New implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing
References: <200701200222.l0K2MIvn031819@localhost.localdomain> <45B2C523.6010808@google.com> <878xfx2jv3.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu> <m3vej1c7mt.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20070121045943.GA16675@nevyn.them.org>

On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

| There's several major objections to optimization based warnings; but
| the one that bugs me most is that we lose them at -O0.

I agree.

The same applies to some of the -Wuninitialized.

-- Gaby

References:
- Re: Patch: New implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Patch: New implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing
  - From: Silvius Rus
- Re: Patch: New implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Patch: New implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Patch: New implementation of -Wstrict-aliasing
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]