This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Operator Strength Reduction on trees

From: Dirk Mueller <dmueller at suse dot de>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:13:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Operator Strength Reduction on trees
References: <17830.49431.391910.490248@whippen.corp.google.com>

On Thursday, 11. January 2007 23:58, Robert Kennedy wrote:

> +static inline bool
> +is_abnormal_name (tree name)

I wonder: what is the recommended naming scheme? It seems most predicates are 
named XXX_p, some are named XXXp though. There are very few is_XXX variants. 

Is there any intention behind this?

Dirk

References:
- [PATCH] Operator Strength Reduction on trees
  - From: Robert Kennedy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]