This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 23:08 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:Ian Lance Taylor wrote:Historical baggage, most likely.-N is a linker option. If you use -N on the gcc command line, gcc will pass it to the linker.
(I don't know why bfin uses it.)
OK, so would you be opposed to removing it? We already are using the patch below for bfin-rtems* for quite a while, but I am sure if we are correct in doing so (We are using binutils-2.17)
Do you have any idea in which version of binutils the bug the comments in t-bfin* refer to has been addressed?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |