Robert Kennedy wrote:
>> Indeed. But if this ever happened we'd have an unfolded tree which
>> would be another bug. Of course silent wrong-code in this case is worse
>> than an ICE, so I agree with the assert.
>
> Ping.
>
> Perhaps I should have followed up in this thread instead, but
> yesterday evening I posted:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00634.html
>
> Is that patch OK now? The assert is added and the test case is there.
It's fine by me. If nobody else comments in 24 hours, check it in.
But, I want to give Richard G. a chance to comment, if he has any concerns.