This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [bfin, patch] Adding bfin-rtems

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>
Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 08 Jan 2007 10:31:28 -0800
Subject: Re: [bfin, patch] Adding bfin*-rtems*
References: <1168237685.5298.5.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <45A22B33.7050804@t-online.de> <1168266750.5298.56.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local>

Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius@rtems.org> writes:

> Can you explain what the 
> GCC_CFLAGS += -N
> in gcc/config/bfin/t-bfin* is trying to resolve?
> 
> I could not find any thing on "-N" in gcc's docs, nor in binutils.

-N is a linker option.  If you use -N on the gcc command line, gcc
will pass it to the linker.

(I don't know why bfin uses it.)

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [bfin, patch] Adding bfin*-rtems*
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

References:
- [bfin, patch] Adding bfin*-rtems*
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: [bfin, patch] Adding bfin*-rtems*
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: [bfin, patch] Adding bfin*-rtems*
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [bfin, patch] Adding bfin*-rtems*

Re: [bfin, patch] Adding bfin-rtems