This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Wmissing-base-class-initializer (PR7651 Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags)


:ADDPATCH C++:

This patch continues the effort to fix PR7651 [1].

A new option -Wmissing-base-class-initializer takes over the warning
for a base class that is not initialized in a derived class' copy
constructor. The new
option is enabled by -Wextra, so we keep the current behaviour but add
the ability to enable/disable this individual warning.

Bootstrapped and regression tested with --enable-languages=all on
i686-pc-linux-gnu.

OK for mainline?

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01103.html

2007-01-07 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <manu@gcc.gnu.org>

PR middle-end/7651
 * c.opt (Wmissing-base-class-initializer): New.
 * doc/invoke.texi (Wmissing-base-class-initializer): Document it.
 (Wextra): Enabled by -Wextra.
 (C++ Language Options): Add it.
 * c-opts.c (c_common_post_options): Enabled by -Wextra.

cp/
2007-01-07  Manuel Lopez-Ibanez  <manu@gcc.gnu.org>

PR middle-end/7651
* init.c (emit_mem_initializers): Replace Wextra with
WWmissing-base-class-initializer.

testsuite/
2007-01-07  Manuel Lopez-Ibanez  <manu@gcc.gnu.org>

PR middle-end/7651
* g++.dg/warn/Wmissing-base-class-initializer.C: New.
* g++.dg/warn/Wmissing-base-class-initializer-no.C: New.
* g++.dg/warn/Wmissing-base-class-initializer.C: New.

Attachment: wmissing-base-class-initializer.diff
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]