This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: more libgcc cruft

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:53:36 +0100
Subject: Re: more libgcc cruft
References: <20070104215829.5961D562A04@mrs2.apple.com> <20070104221807.GA31911@nevyn.them.org> <603AABEE-D719-4E2C-9B93-7426AB984A82@apple.com> <20070104231542.GA1791@nevyn.them.org> <459EA48C.1080303@lu.unisi.ch> <531D5D47-5D62-40AD-AA14-5FF9E0A94AD3@apple.com>

You're right, they go up one level from where I thought.
Give me a little while to digest whether it can *ever* exist
If you can find the mkinstalldirs for libgcc, that'd indicate it can exist. The old one was in mklibgcc.in. Without a creation of the directory, it can never exist.

Fair enough, the patch is ok. My "digest whether it can *ever* exist" amounted to doing such a grep.

Paolo

References:
- more libgcc cruft
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: more libgcc cruft
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: more libgcc cruft
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: more libgcc cruft
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]