This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: more libgcc left-overs
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:19:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: more libgcc left-overs
- References: <20070104221529.0C5F0562A2C@mrs2.apple.com>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:15:29PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> I just spotted the one below as well. I think it is right, if the
> other patch to remove the rm -rf libgcc is approved, however, it
> indicates (may indicate) that we test less, no comparisons of libgcc
> between the stages. Is this expected? Should I file a bug for it?
>
> Ok?
>
> * Makefile.in (slowcompare): Don't compare libgcc objects.
No path in your patch, but these are the gcc/Makefile.in bootstrap
rules, aren't they?
They're not used any more. Paolo posted a patch to delete them, though
I don't know if it's been applied yet. The comparison happens one
level higher up instead.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery