This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bounds-checking for Fortran testsuite was: Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes

Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote on Wed, 13 Dec 2006:
My Tcl-fu is nil, but does this patch fix it? 

Most likely but this patch is not enough to keep some failures away if
the target GCC supports altivec but the machine does not.  Likewise for
SSE2.  FX's testresults show those failures.  Maybe adding the testing
of a trivial.f90 which contains a couple of vectorizable loops inside
fortran-torture.exp will fix that issue.

Hm, so why does this not happen with the vect testsuite? I was precisely following its logic, which says "on i686, always _run_ tests". I could add something like check_vmx_hw_available, of course, I'm just wondering.

- Tobi


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]