This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > | struct T {};
| > | struct S {
| > | T T();
| > | };
| > |
| > | name lookup for the T appearing as a type-specifier would still find the
| > | outer T, and that therefore the binding to the member function T does
| > | not affect validity.
| >
| > I don't follow that reasoning.
|
| The standard says that its an error if name lookup would find a
| different binding after the class is complete.
yes.
| But, it wouldn't: it
| would still find the global T, since type-specifiers are looked up
| specially.
I believe that special rule applies only if we used "struct" in front of
the first "T", e.g.
struct T { };
struct S {
struct T T();
};
is valid.
[...]
| If you're confident that the code is invalid, would you mind asking on
| the core reflect to double-check?
I was in the middle of composing the mail when I just got this message :-)
You should see the reflector message in a moment.
-- Gaby
- References:
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory
- Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory