This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: IPA merge part 2: operand-cache privatization

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dnovillo at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:35:01 -0800
Subject: Re: IPA merge part 2: operand-cache privatization
References: <20061130090617.GB16780@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1164893870.2874.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061130134041.GH26260@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1164895217.2874.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Nov 30, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:40 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 10:06 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Looks good to me.
Thanks!  I am not sure if it counts as approval? :)
(after removing the leftover comment)
Sorry, yes it does :-)

Hum, I use the rth 'Ok' in that context, and the 'Looks good to me', when I am not listed as a maintainer... :-)

References:
- IPA merge part 2: operand-cache privatization
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: IPA merge part 2: operand-cache privatization
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: IPA merge part 2: operand-cache privatization
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: IPA merge part 2: operand-cache privatization
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]