Re: RFA: tuples merge for GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT

[Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>]

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:01:53AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Aldy Hernandez wrote on 11/16/06 04:04:
> 
> >If you are still unconvinced, I am willing to get rid of
> >GIMPLE_MODIFY_OPERAND in favor of just using one all knowing macro:
> >TREE_OPERAND.  It would certainly make my life a LOT easier, at the expense
> >of one more conditional in the macro.  Perhaps this is the best approach:
> >less changes, one more conditional, less work, more beer.
> >
> Actually, how about we rename PROTECTED_TREE_OPERAND as 
> GENERIC_TREE_OPERAND?  That is, after all, what the accessor does.

Okay.  Sounds reasonable.

Aldy