This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Compare addresses in operand_equal_p correctly

From: Richard Sandiford <richard at codesourcery dot com>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:50:34 +0000
Subject: Re: [patch] Compare addresses in operand_equal_p correctly
References: <20061109233208.GA6299@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0611091650240.1142-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com> writes:
>> ! 	  return (OP_SAME (0)
>> ! 		  && OP_SAME (1)
>>   		  && OP_SAME_WITH_NULL (2)
>>   		  && OP_SAME_WITH_NULL (3));
>
> You don't need the outermost parenthesis around return expressions
> in the GNU coding style.

But you do need them for multi-line conditionals AIUI.

Richard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Compare addresses in operand_equal_p correctly
  - From: Roger Sayle

References:
- [patch] Compare addresses in operand_equal_p correctly
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [patch] Compare addresses in operand_equal_p correctly
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]