This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: fix bugs in likely_spilled_retval_1 / likely_spilled_retval_p (Was: Re: RFA: Fix rtl-optimization/22258)
- From: Joern RENNECKE <joern dot rennecke at st dot com>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask at sygehus dot dk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:54:38 +0000
- Subject: Re: RFA: fix bugs in likely_spilled_retval_1 / likely_spilled_retval_p (Was: Re: RFA: Fix rtl-optimization/22258)
- References: <42C44729.1070207@st.com> <200611051255.51870.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20061113035733.GF24007@sygehus.dk> <200611131321.17508.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Eric Botcazou wrote:
Bootstrapped and tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu with no new failures and no
new passes.
Great. Can either of you install the fix on mainline? It would also be nice
to put a couple of ??? notes on the 4.1 and 4.2 branches (unless you can
exhibit a regression that would be fixed by this patch, in which case we
could consider putting it on the 4.2 branch too).
As of revision Revision 118652, I still see an 'events output' regression
when I compare the FAILs from the pristine bootstrap with the one
of the patched sources:
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -O3 -g (test for excess
errors)
27c28
< FAIL: Thread_Alive -O3 execution - source compiled test
---
> FAIL: events output