This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 'lots of little changes' merge done
- From: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- To: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:13:27 -0700 (MST)
- Subject: Re: 'lots of little changes' merge done
Hi Geoff,
I'd hoped someone else would report this so I wouldn't be the bearer
of bad news. But the following hunk appears to have broken the default
bootstrap on i386-apple-darwin8.8.1 for me.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
>
> * config/darwin.h (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Don't do weird things with -@.
> Call dsymutil when compiling and linking one or more source files
> in one step.
Many thanks to Andrew Pinski on IRC for helping to identify the
problematic bit.
On my recent x86/darwin system, this change causes the build to break
during configuration of libintl during stage2. One of the configure
checks attempts "checking for C compiler default output file name..."
which then fails, reporting that the C compiler cannot create executables.
The cause of the failure is that attempting to compile a minimal test
program such as
int main() { return 0; }
with prev-gcc/xgcc -Bprev-gcc -O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer main.c
triggers the fatal error message:
ERROR: No debug map or DWARF data was found to link.
presumably from dsymutil.
ld -v reports my version as
Apple Computer, Inc. version cctools-622.3.obj~2
and dsymutil -v reports
@(#)PROGRAM:dsymutil PROJECT:dwarfutils-22 DEVELOPER:root BUILT:Jul 1
2006 19:28:59
Many thanks to Andrew for suggesting that a work around is to avoid
compiling and linking in a single step, using -c to generate an object
file, and then linking that. Unfortunately, this confirms the source
of the problem, but it isn't a reasonable fix for use in "configure".
Is it possible to add a new configure test to check whether a suitable
version of dsymutil exists on a machine? Is there a particular version
of cctools/xcode that I need to upgrade or downgrade to?
Many thanks in advance,
Roger
--