This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[patch,fortran] Fix keyword check for specifiers (PR29452)


:ADDPATCH fortran:

Hello,

this patch fixes some problems with the string comparisons for the
argument checks:

- In libgfortran, the "YES"/"NO" etc. checks where only checking whether
the first (length of fortran string) characters match. That way (Fortran
string) "N" matched (C string) "NO" etc.

- In the write/read check section of io.c, the advance argument was
compared against "YE" and "NO", thus "NOT", "YET","Yessica", etc. also
matches. As we have C strings, I replaced the str-n-casecmp( . , . , 2)
by strcasecmp.

I didn't use compare_to_allowed_values as the "not_no" is also used for
other checks (EOR and SIZE). When the missing 7 specifiers with keywords
are added, one can consider changing also this test to use
compare_to_allowed_values.

Tobias


2006-10-26  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

    PR fortran/29452
    * io.c (check_io_constraints): Fix keyword string comparison.

2006-10-26  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

    PR fortran/29452
   * runtime/string.c (compare0): Check whether string lengths match.

2006-10-26  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

    PR fortran/29452
    * gfortran.dg/write_check.f90: Check run-time keyword checking.
    * gfortran.dg/write_check2.f90: Check compile-time keyword checking.
Index: gcc/fortran/io.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/io.c	(Revision 118060)
+++ gcc/fortran/io.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -2697,8 +2701,8 @@
       if (expr->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT && expr->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)
 	{
 	  const char * advance = expr->value.character.string;
-	  not_no = strncasecmp (advance, "no", 2) != 0;
-	  not_yes = strncasecmp (advance, "yes", 2) != 0;
+	  not_no = strcasecmp (advance, "no") != 0;
+	  not_yes = strcasecmp (advance, "yes") != 0;
 	}
       else
 	{
Index: libgfortran/runtime/string.c
===================================================================
--- libgfortran/runtime/string.c        (Revision 118060)
+++ libgfortran/runtime/string.c        (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@

   /* Strip trailing blanks from the Fortran string.  */
   len = fstrlen (s1, s1_len);
+  if(len != strlen(s2)) return 0; /* don't match */
   return strncasecmp (s1, s2, len) == 0;
 }

--- /dev/null	2006-10-15 18:34:35.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/write_check.f90	2006-10-26 09:33:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+program test
+  implicit none
+  character(len=5) :: str
+  str = 'no'
+  write(*,'(a)',advance=str) 'Foo'
+  str = 'yes'
+  write(*,'(a)',advance=str) 'Foo'
+  str = 'NOT'
+  write(*,'(a)',advance=str) 'Foo'
+end program test
+! { dg-output "At line 10 of file.*" }
+! { dg-output "Fortran runtime error: Bad ADVANCE parameter in data transfer statement" }
--- /dev/null	2006-10-15 18:34:35.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/write_check2.f90	2006-10-17 00:45:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+  character(len=20) :: str
+  write(13,'(a)',advance='yes')  'Hello:'
+  write(13,'(a)',advance='no')   'Hello:'
+  write(13,'(a)',advance='y')    'Hello:' ! { dg-error "ADVANCE=specifier at (1) must have value = YES or NO."}
+  write(13,'(a)',advance='yet')  'Hello:' ! { dg-error "ADVANCE=specifier at (1) must have value = YES or NO."}
+  write(13,'(a)',advance='yess') 'Hello:' ! { dg-error "ADVANCE=specifier at (1) must have value = YES or NO."}
+  end

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]