This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [COMMITTED][PATCH/RFC] force_reg() doesn't propagate MEM_POINTER flag to REG_POINTER
- From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Anton Blanchard <anton at samba dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:07:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: [COMMITTED][PATCH/RFC] force_reg() doesn't propagate MEM_POINTER flag to REG_POINTER
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0609211932430.19367-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <1158933848.7581.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> <453822F5.307@avtrex.com> <453827FC.1020507@avtrex.com> <1161316399.28101.0.camel@celery.andrew.com>
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 18:35 -0700, David Daney wrote:
It looks like Janis committed this to the 4.1 branch as well (although I
missed a message on gcc-patches announcing the commit). I have not
tested it on the branch, but I would expect similar failures on MIPS to
those seen on the trunk.
No Janis did not apply it to the 4.1 branch but IBM's 4.1 branch.
My mistake. Please accept my apologies for implying that gcc-patches
procedures were not followed.
David Daney