This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR19262 more than thirty-nine continuation lines should issue a std-warn

From: Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:54:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR19262 more than thirty-nine continuation lines should issue a std-warn
References: <4514D181.4060905@verizon.net> <4514DFCD.8070501@net-b.de>

Tobias Burnus wrote:

How about:
* default and -std=f2003: 255 (free form)
* -std=f90 and -std=f95: 39 (free form)
* -std=f2003: 255 (fixed form)
* -std=f77, -std=f90, -std=f95: 19 (fixed form)
* default (fixed form): 19 ?

I would suggest 255 for default in fixed form; I don't think it makes sense for the -std= options to be allowing things that are not allowed by default (except maybe in rare cases which this is not one of).

- Brooks

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR19262 more than thirty-nine continuation lines should issue a std-warn
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR19262 more than thirty-nine continuation lines should issue a std-warn
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]