This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[patch] gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5: don't xfail lp64 revised


Dorit,
    I've added back in the '"vectorized 2 loops" 1 "vect"'
test line and verified the revised patch works on both Darwin PPC
at -m64 and x86_64. Okay for trunk?
             Jack


2006-09-19   Jack Howarth  <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>

	* gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90: Don't xfail lp64.

Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90	(revision 117054)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90	(working copy)
@@ -35,9 +35,9 @@
         stop
         end
 
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 2 loops" 1 "vect" { xfail { lp64 } } } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align || lp64 } } } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 2 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align || lp64 } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 2 loops" 1 "vect"  } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 2 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using versioning." 3 "vect" { target { ilp32 && vect_no_align } } } }
 
 ! We also expect to vectorize one loop for lp64 targets that support 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]