This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[patch] gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5: don't xfail lp64
- From: howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu (Jack Howarth)
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: DORIT at il dot ibm dot com
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:57:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: [patch] gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5: don't xfail lp64
Since we are now passing the gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90
testcase on 64-bit platforms, stop xfailing lp64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-09/msg00330.html
Tested on Darwin PPC at -m64 and on x86_64.
Okay for gcc trunk?
Jack
2006-09-14 Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
* gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90: Don't xfail lp64.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 (revision 117048)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 (working copy)
@@ -35,9 +35,8 @@
stop
end
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 2 loops" 1 "vect" { xfail { lp64 } } } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align || lp64 } } } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 2 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align || lp64 } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 2 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using versioning." 3 "vect" { target { ilp32 && vect_no_align } } } }
! We also expect to vectorize one loop for lp64 targets that support