This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] x86_64 darwin work

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 00:07:58 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64 darwin work
References: <4500E776.1000808@apple.com> <45012012.6050206@lu.unisi.ch> <4501ADCA.1070105@apple.com> <4501E970.3030707@lu.unisi.ch>

Paolo Bonzini wrote:

+ use_long_long_for_widest_fast_int=yes

This seems wrong.
It's because there's no x86_64-*-darwin* target.
You can still not use_long_long_for_widest_fast_int even on 64-bit targets. You don't lose much, especially considering how much you do lose if you have this setting on 32-bit targets.

Pardon, s/targets/hosts/g.

Paolo

References:
- [patch] x86_64 darwin work
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [patch] x86_64 darwin work
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [patch] x86_64 darwin work
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [patch] x86_64 darwin work
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]