This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fw: [patch] [4.2 projects] vectorize strided accesses (4 patches)
- From: Victor Kaplansky <VICTORK at il dot ibm dot com>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:13:44 +0300
- Subject: Re: Fw: [patch] [4.2 projects] vectorize strided accesses (4 patches)
Roger,
I'm working on merging mainline changes into autovect branch just now.
Which BOOT_CFLAGS did you use?
-- Victor
gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 05.09.2006 15:56:11:
>
> Hi Ira (and the other autovect folks),
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Ira Rosen wrote:
> > Is it O.K. for mainline 4.3 with those changes?
>
> I recently tried doing a full top-level bootstrap of the autovect branch
> on i686-pc-linux-gnu where it currently fails to build due to an ICE
> whilst building libjava. After waiting a few weeks I tried again, but
> with the same result. It's not clear whether this is a pre-existing
> java condition from the branch's last merge with mainline, or a problem
> associated with the autovect changes.
>
> Any chance I could ask one of the autovect folks to look into the issue
> and keep the autovect branch buildable? This helps inspire confidence
> that integrating changes to mainline should be safe. If a branch has
> problems even for common targets the new code probably hasn't stablized
> enough to be integrated. This applies not just to autovect but all of
> GCC's other development branches.
>
> Roger
> --
>